Subscribe to Community Blogs

Community Blogs

+ new post

Satellite Images of Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill from NASA

 
Posted by Anil KapurUser2758_level Friday, April 30 2010 3 comments

gulf_tmo_2010119_1.jpg

Here are some satellite images and a report from NASA about the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill:

A massive oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico continued spreading on April 29, 2010, moving perilously close to shore, according to news reports. The U.S. Coast Guard attempted controlled burns on some of the oil to prevent its spread, but had to halt the process due to high winds. Meanwhile, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration constructed a dome-and-pipe system to contain the spread of oil at the sea floor.

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA's Terra satellite captured a natural-color image of the oil slick just off the Louisiana coast. The top image shows a wide-area view, and the bottom image shows a close-up view of the oil slick (outlined in white in the top image). The oil slick appears as dull gray interlocking comma shapes, one opaque and the other nearly transparent. The northwestern tip of the oil slick almost touches the Mississippi Delta. Sunglint-the mirror-like reflection of the Sun off the water-enchances the oil slick's visibility.

The oil slick resulted from an explosion that occurred on April 20, 2010, on the Deepwater Horizon rig. Two days after the explosion, the rig sank to the ocean floor, and a pipe connected to the well on the sea floor broke. Oil began leaking from the pipe, The New York Times reported. The following week, the U.S. Coast Guard discovered a new leak, and also found that five times as much oil was pouring from the well as initially assumed, according to Reuters.

Various methods of containing oil spills have been developed, including controlled burns, domes over the oil spill, and the use of remotely operated vehicles to manipulate equipment on the sea floor. The depth of this oil well-5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below the ocean surface-has complicated all proposed mitigation efforts. To protect wildlife along the shorelines of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, authorities were monitoring possible impacts of oil residue, and considering using cannons to scare birds away from affected areas and using shrimper boats to skim oil.

gulf_tmo_2010119_2.jpg

Did you like this article?

0%0%

Share this:

 

Comments

  • Mr_t_is_yoda

    Roger CappsApprentice said on April 30, 2010

    This is horrible. I read that the spill will be bigger than the Exxon Valdez disaster. The impact to the eco system and economy in the Gulf of Mexico could be devastating.
  • Gw_new_profile_pic2

    Anil KapurUser2758_level said on May 01, 2010

    Yes this is terrible and they are saying it is so big that they will not be able to clean all of it up.
  • 24

    Keyla koApprentice said on May 07, 2010

    This incident is really horrible for it will not affect the lives of organisms on that water but it would also affect us especially those person who earn their living through fishing. An attainable scapegoat has been found to blame the Gulf of Mexico Oil spill on. BP has taken accountability for cleaning the mess and Transocean has taken some of the responsibility as well, but now both organizations are looking at Halliburton, a cement firm. The <a title="Halliburton oil spill: Is Halliburton to blame for Gulf disaster?" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/04/halliburton-oil-spill-gulf-disaster/">Halliburton oil spill</a> is said to have been due to negligence on the company who was employed to cement the oil well. In the event the oil well isn't cemented properly gasses can leak out causing an explosion. There have been a number of other oil explosions blamed on this method as well. Halliburton has claimed to have concluded their work merely 20 hours ahead of the explosion, but takes no responsibility for the oil spill or blast that possibly killed 11 people.

Leave a comment

hits counter