Subscribe to this blog

Elizah Leigh's Instant Greenification

+ new post

Not So Fast!! Are You Really Sure You Want To S.W.A.K.?

 
Posted by Elizah LeighUser517_level Friday, June 19 2009 5 comments

Lipstick-on-a-pig.jpg

Why is it that the female species in both animal and human kingdoms traditionally resemble plain Janes compared to their male counterparts? For some reason, boys always seem to be naturally prettier, whether they are lions, peacocks, birds, rock stars or runway models. While some ladies are fortunate enough to look flawless the moment that they roll out of bed, the one thing that they always seem to reach for is a little touch of lipstick so that they can take things to the next level of awesome.

Lips_005.jpg

It’s hard to imagine, but cosmetic ornamentation actually pre-dates the Indus Valley Civilization of 2600–1900 BCE (now known as Pakistan and a few Indian states). Women well before our time first began applying crushed semi-precious stones on their lips but they fast transitioned into very unusual and often dangerous territory by staining them with highly caustic bomine mannite, carmine beetle pigment, iodine, red cinnabar (a poisonous mercury-based element) and plant-based fucus-algin, which imparted a purple-red tint.

lipstick.JPG

By the 20th century, the familiar twist tube that enables women to achieve their signature ruby red lips was readily available, but whale spermaceti (also known as “whale oil blubber”) was the main wax-based ingredient used to impart moisturization and spreadability.  When a moratorium on whaling was finally launched in the 1970s, lipstick manufacturers began to look for suitable alternatives which led them to using the rendered fatty subdural layer of an animal known as the mink. Both sources of oil -- whale and mink -- were highly unpopular with animal activists, resulting in enough negative media exposure to compel companies to explore synthetically derived and plant based moisturizers like:

  •   Castor Oil (an oil derived from the seed/bean of the Castor plant -- when  consumed regularly, it causes excessive urination)
  •   Lanolin (a viscous animal oil extracted from wool)
  •   Olive Oil
  •   Candelilla Wax (derived from the leaves of the small Candelilla shrub)
  •   Cocoa Butter (a pure vegetable fat extracted from the cacao bean)
  •   Beeswax
  •   Carnauba (derived from wax palm tree leaves)
  •   Paraffin (derived from crude petroleum)

cow-brains-lipstick-761691.gif

Across the world however, conventionally produced lipsticks available via mainstream retailers continue to be laden with ingredients that are more than a bit surprising. Petroleum waxes are among the most common, but the Environmental Working Group (EWG) claims that there are many others made with rendered animal fats. When Mad Cow Disease entered public awareness, the Food and Drug Administration informed companies that while they could continue using rendered brain and spinal cord tissue from younger cattle in their products, they were forbidden from using 30 month or older cows/downer cows to create the fat bases for their lipsticks.

  lead.jpg

If that’s not alarming enough, EWG found that after testing 711 top cosmetic brands in their 2004 study, 28 percent of them contained highly toxic or health-compromising ingredients like carcinogenic coal tar dyes, titanium dioxide, butylated hydroxytoluene and detectable levels of lead while the majority of the chemical components were deemed untested for human safety. The US consumer group Campaign For Safe Cosmetics determined just three years later that lead was present in 60 percent of lipsticks tested, including Cover Girl Incredifull Lipcolor in “Maximum Red”, Dior Addict in “Positive Red” and L’Oreal Colour Riche “Classic Wine” and “True Red” (whereas Revlon lipsticks had none whatsoever). Lead helps deepen color, which is why it has been used in the auto industry to help cars retain the vibrancy of their paint. Cars may love it, but when humans are exposed to it, they can suffer reproductive toxicity, neurological damage, heart problems and kidney failure.

Lipstick_grass.jpg

There are infinitely safer alternatives for women who want to paint their lips without suffering from the fear of the unknown. If you are industrious, you can make your own tint by combining one tablespoon of grated beeswax in a double boiler with two tablespoons of olive oil and tinting it with one teaspoon of beet juice or beet root powder. Pour it into a re-sealable container, allow it to solidify and then apply it with a lip brush. If you’re more of an instant gratification gal, then you probably know that companies like HoneyBee, Zuii, Cargo and NVEY Eco are in competition with many others to meet the growing demand for organic lip colors. Whole Foods, Sunflower Market, Sephora and department stores carry an increasingly varied range of natural choices for the eco-conscious gal as do countless online purveyors. If you are a fan of a particular line of organic cosmetics, please let everyone know in the comments section below!

Did you like this article?

100.0%0.0%

Share this:

 

Comments

  • Mark

    Mark ButkusApprentice said on June 20, 2009

    Elizah,

    Well done. As a male my knowledge of cosmetics is lacking. But I am familiar with the whale blubber awareness campaign in the 70s. While I see evidence of less harmful cosmetics on the market today I am curious as to whether the sector is steady, rising or lagging behind the levels of the 70s when we were enlightened about industry practices.

    Cheers,

    Mark
    • Elizah_leigh_head_shot_august_2009

      Elizah LeighUser517_level said on June 20, 2009

      Did you know that 50% of the adult population -- namely MEN -- are responsible for 1/5 of the current annual cosmetic sales in the U.S.? (This is a legitimate factoid!) Methinks that you must know a lot more about cosmetics than you are apparently letting on...nudge nudge, wink wink. Hey, a little bronzer never hurt anyone.

      In regard to your question of whether the eco-vegan friendly cosmetics market is rising beyond 1970s levels (back when animal rights activists first pushed whale blubber and mink oil into the American consciousness), the answer is an unequivocable YES. Admittedly, the "natural look" (born out of the New Age and feministic trend to embrace a bare face) was a huge trend during that period. Anti-makeup and au naturel sentiments were addressed with clever marketing campaigns celebrating the newly liberated woman. For every woman who chose to stain her lips with crush berries, there was a cosmetics company poised and ready to nature-wash their product line. Some of the most popular methods employed at the time included: a) giving products natural sounding/naturally flavored attributes b) focusing on the potential medicinal benefits of lipstick ingredients c) incorporating plant extracts into lipcolors. It is ridiculously challenging to locate actual natural cosmetic sales figures circa 1970+, but I can't imagine that the industry could touch the growth apparent in today's market.

      Mintel International reported that the number of U.S. launched natural/organic cosmetic and beauty care products leapt from 5% (between 2005 and 2006) to 62% (between 2006 and 2007) which translates into annual retail sales of $88.6 million in 2006 to $120 million in 2008. Those facts alone provide evidence that there is a steadily growing consumer interest in natural cosmetic alternatives, but there are underlying (and obvious) factors at play. ***Increased social responsibility, growing concern about product safety and a desire to embrace wellness.*** While Whole Foods and smaller natural markets have long embraced natural offerings, it is a sign of the times and the growing market that even Target and Wal-mart are working on developing their own natural and organic lines. In 2008, Aubrey Organics sales were estimated to reach $45 Million and both Tarte Cosmetics and Jason Natural Cosmetics achieved sales of $25 million in the same year. Not too shabby for a few formerly small little organic cosmetic underdogs... I would say that the industry is most definitely RISING compared to 1970s levels.
  • Mark

    Mark ButkusApprentice said on June 21, 2009

    Elizah,
    You never fail to enlighten me. The amount of research that goes into your articles in incredible.
    As for the nudge, nudge, wink, wink,..everything that I know about the cosmetic industry I've learned in the last month reading the posts here at Greenwala.
    I buy all my cosmetics/toiletries at the dollar store. Not very green on first blush but I think all that stuff would end up in a landfill if not for me.
    • Elizah_leigh_head_shot_august_2009

      Elizah LeighUser517_level said on June 21, 2009

      Au contraire -- if I had included as many interesting little morsels of information as I really wanted to, I think that I might have scared everyone off. I think I'm a bit of a fact hoarder, and that's not always a good thing. It's hard to believe that the topic of lipstick could elicit such a volume of "did you know" facts but I learned that the industry as a whole is really messed up. There has been so little regard for the health and safety of people using their products -- sort of like the food biz. In many cases, it seems as though we end up being unwitting guinea pigs stuck in a warped science experiment -- there's too much of a "cross your fingers and hope for the best" mentality going on.
  • Img_6156

    jen wApprentice said on June 21, 2009

    Elizah and Mark,

    You BOTH wow me! I enjoy reading your articles, as well as the banter between you. Great minds think alike and you clearly walk the walk. Bravo!

Leave a comment